Cons of Euthanasia

There atomic number 18 a number of pro's and con's regarding the issue of euthanasia. Those who favor euthanasia think that a patient should be everyowed to choose death in cases in which there is no hope of rec everyplacey. They feel that dying is sometimes better than being kept alive through remarkable means. For example, some terminally-ill patients whitethorn choose death because it is more honor than being kept alive with a life-support system. separate patients might choose death in order to be relieved from the suffering and pain which atomic number 18 associated with terminal illness. quiet other patients might choose death because of the financial file which is required in order to pay for their life-support systems. In all of these cases, the idea of the patient's right to free choice is involved. Thus, the major(ip) argument in favor of euthanasia is that it pertains to an individuals right to self-determination. In cases in which patients atomic number 18 incapable of indicating their hold choice, proponents of euthanasia believe that the immediate family should nurse the right to decide what the patient would have wanted.

Those who are opposed to euthanasia, on the other hand, see it as a form of murder, because it involves one person helping other to die. Some opponents argue th

unseasonable because a cure for a person's illness could be discovered

The volume of the public believes that the patient plays an important role in euthanasia decisions. Most people agree that the patient should have the net right to choose in such matters. In this regard, " unremarkably we take it that people are the best judges of their own interests and this is why, in so many circumstances, consent is so important." It is believed that euthanasia must always be voluntary, otherwise it crosses over into the dry land of murder. Of course, some hopeless patients are unable to express their wishes because they are in a coma or a vegetational state. For this reason, most proponents of euthanasia recommend the use of "living wills," in which people are able to tell in acclivity what they would want done in such cases.

Medical professionals in addition play an important role in euthanasia decisions. It may be noted that all doctors are bound to a Hippocratic Oath which requires them to always punish to save lives quite an than end them. At the same time, however, the Hippocratic Oath requires doctors to try and eliminate pain and suffering in their patients whenever possible. With this reasoning, the official station of the American Medical

"The Return of Dr. Death." Time 137 (18 February 1991): 45.

Many members of the public are influenced in their opinions by the official Church position on euthanasia. Euthanasia raises a number of religious issues because it pertains to life and death and the power of human beings over such forces. The Church believes that all human life is sacred; however, it also contends that there are certain cases in which passive euthanasia is more charitable than keeping a person alive by pyrotechnic means. The religious position holds that God alone has control over life and death. Thus,, if a person is dying, it is seen as being an tour of God's will. From this perspective, "it makes sense to talk about 'placing patients in God's hands,' j
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.