PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
BY
MADU SIMON O
|(SS/PP/1958)
JANUARY 2011
INTRODUCTION
In modern times, science is super esteemed. Apparently it is widely held belief that there is something special to the highest degree science and its method which makes it highly acceptable and reliable whenever it is associated with a research, theory or body of knowledge. There is an abundance of try from everyday life that science is held in high envision in spite of various criticism leveled against it.
The media; through adverts; oft assert that a particular product, way of life or actions perk up been scientifically proven to be more expedient than others. By doing so, they hope to imply that their claim is particularly swell-founded and perhaps beyond dispute. Many areas of study as well are described as sciences by their supporters; presumably in an effort to imply that the methods used are as intemperately grounded and potentially fruitful as the traditional sciences, say physics. In all of these, we have before us a manage appeal to the authority of science and scientists. We might well ask, what is the soil for such authority? Or what is this scientific method that allegedly leads to especially reliable results? Many philosophers have attempted to perform these questions which are also attempts to demarcate science from non-science and pseudo-science, by stating what we should have as the method involved in science.
However, this paper aims at postulating and assessing the philosophical arguments of Feyerabend with regards to...If you want to get a full essay, society it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment