Locate, read, and review the following article: Chatman, Jennifer A. and O'Reilly, Charles A. 2004. Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (2): 193-208.

This debate aims to [explain] how work group change state composition influences manpower and wo manpower, and how demographic diverseness influences organizations and their members and how sex form influences various work processes and outcomes(p193), pursual the lead of past look for and rely on the coincidence attraction paradigm. The reservoirs argue the stump of the minority and view expectations states theory, to scar their pertain together with comparison attraction theory. as result, they tried four-spot hypotheses in research[Deduction]: supposal 1 is relative to status expectations states theory, meditation 2a,b,c are relative to proportion attraction theory. They studied 178 professional men and women respondents [cross-sectional design] (from [survey] covered 189, they dropped 4 inconsistent and 7 incomplete[Sampling error]), in trinity [randomly] chosen divisions of a grownup clothing and manufacturer.[Stratified] Respondents participation in the research was voluntary and their data would be confidential.[ethical] They conducted a field study to check over whether men and women reacted differently to world members of self-coloured, majority male/ womanish, minority male/female and equilibrise work groups. Respondents indicated their sex on the survey.

[Self-completion Questionnaires] For dependent variables: the author utilize deferential methods: they asked respondents a hypothetical question under seven mark to [measure] their likeliness of transferring from current work group, used Caldwell, Chatman and OReillys (1990) eight-item scale to appreciate prescriptive commitment [replication], also assessed respondents imperative affect and their groups cooperation using old scales. They controlled respondents status, age, education, knowledge, work team tenure and race. They used[Statistics]: regard as , s.d, formulas etc. [Quantitative] They found that: theory 1: was completely support and Hypothesis 2a,b,c: were partially supported in women side. However, contrary to hypothesis 2a,b,c men who worked in homogeneous were less(prenominal) committed to the organization, expressed the lowest... If you ask to get a mount essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.