After this cross-examination occurred, the defending team attorneys attacked the methods which the Los Angeles patrol Department had used to obtain their evidence. The plea attorneys accused the police investigators of being sloppy in their handling of the physical evidence. The defense also claimed the collection records were incomplete and that the police department should apply made and filed n bingles regarding which investigator collected each stain. Thus, the defense started to present that the evidence samples could have been mixed up, and that swatches could have been accidentally placed in the wrong envelope and a stain which was collected from one place at the crime scene baron have actually been collected from another place at the scene (Schiller, 1996, pp. 186-187).
The prosecution was able to re scarcely the accusations made by the Simpson defense team by showing that even if the blood samples had been mixed up, it di
Four other drops of blood were tested with a slightly less precise, but still reliable DNA test called Polymerase Chain reception (PCR), which matched Simpson's blood with a one in 240,000 match. Both of these tests documented the blood and hold the samples so that the lab tests could reveal the individual from whom the blood came.
Detective Fuhrman was accused of planting this second glove. However, Fuhrman was not alone when he found the glove and he is not the person who picked up the glove. Police investigator Fung collected and preserved the glove as evidence (Bugliosi, 1996, p. 314).
But it is unlikely that Fuhrman position the glove because blue-black fibers, identical to those found in the apparel Ron Goldman was wearing, were found on the second glove (Abramson, 1996, p. 113).
Bugliosi, V. (1996). Outrage: The vanadium Reasons Why O J. Simpson Got Away With Murder. New York: Norton.
Nevertheless the defense team wanted to betoken that the police had messed up the investigation. Thus, the defense had to argue that the police made a mistake by somehow contaminating the evidence. Scheck and one of the defense's experts, John Gerdes, claimed that the police lab was a "cesspool of contamination" (Darden, 1996, p. 343).
Later the defense would argue that because officer Fuhrman was a racist, he might have contaminated the samples. (Fuhrman had initially denied knowing a woman called Kathleen Bell who had taped-recorded his racial slurs years before)(Kennedy, 1995, pp. 243-245). However, officer Fuhrman was never allowed into the police lab, which would have meant that one of the lab technicians would have had to intentionally mix the samples (as Dr. Henry downwind implied during his in-court testimony), which is highly unlikely.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment